aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/dvb-t/uk-BristolIlchesterCrescent
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJonathan McCrohan <jmccrohan@gmail.com>2013-09-19 01:46:23 +0100
committerOliver Schinagl <oliver@schinagl.nl>2013-09-20 14:53:55 +0200
commit6213a2f4e91bcef2f3aac0768fffb26ac5cfa617 (patch)
tree488ab4a9e856d73f422ddb44f47e84f302f911bc /dvb-t/uk-BristolIlchesterCrescent
parentbbc890eba7b7578011e95840f43fb3138a2b6be9 (diff)
downloaddtv-scan-tables-6213a2f4e91bcef2f3aac0768fffb26ac5cfa617.tar.gz
Table /usr/share/dvb/dvb-t/cz-All outdated
reassign 720879 dtv-scan-tables forwarded 720879 oliver@schinagl.nl thanks Hi Pavel, On 25/08/13 22:32, Pavel Mendl wrote: > Package: dvb-apps > Version: 1.1.1+rev1483-1 > > When I did run scan command using /usr/share/dvb/dvb-t/cz-All table, some > channels that my "ordinary" TV did tune did not tune (even attempt to tune) on > the PC TV adapter. I traced issue to > the aforementioned table, which is (by commented header inside the table) > taken from public sources not directly under the CZ TV regulator's control. I > found the official broadcast spectrum > regulation (as of August 2012 - currently valid) here > http://www.ctu.cz/cs/download/plan-vyuziti-radioveho-spektra/rok_2012/pv- > p_10-08_2012-11.pdf > > It states on pages 9, 15-16 that all the channels 21-60 are allocated for > various DVB-T networks in the country. The aforementioned table cz-All did > include just some of them, what lead to > "missing" of some newly installed channels from the scanning. (Understandable, > DVB-T is still in the development phase in Czech republic and many spectrum > allocations are still designated as > testing or not-definitive.) > > Attached is the new table I created, ensuring scan of all the channels > theoretically allocatable in Czech republic. Tested on my own comp it really > found channels consistent with the TV box scan, > with no bugging. > > The only part I am not sure about is the guard-interval where 1/4 and 1/8 > values were irregularly mixed in the original table and no regulatory > guidelines are released. Based on the theoretical > assumption, that 1/8 should tune (i.e. not exclude) more channels than 1/4, I > entered 1/8 for all the channels. Should you have better experience or > regulatory resources on the topic, please, > correct these values as appropriate. > > I suggest to replace the cz-All table with my updated one in the next release. Thanks for your mail. The scan files have been split out into a separate package called dtv-scan-tables. Therefore I am reassigning it to d-s-t. Oliver Schinagl (CC'd) is the upstream dtv-scan-tables maintainer. I have reattached your cz-All-actual-2013 for his consideration. Thanks, Jon Signed-off-by: Oliver Schinagl <oliver@schinagl.nl>
Diffstat (limited to 'dvb-t/uk-BristolIlchesterCrescent')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions