diff options
author | Jonathan McCrohan <jmccrohan@gmail.com> | 2013-09-19 01:46:23 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Oliver Schinagl <oliver@schinagl.nl> | 2013-09-20 14:53:55 +0200 |
commit | 6213a2f4e91bcef2f3aac0768fffb26ac5cfa617 (patch) | |
tree | 488ab4a9e856d73f422ddb44f47e84f302f911bc /dvb-t/de-Erfurt-Weimar | |
parent | bbc890eba7b7578011e95840f43fb3138a2b6be9 (diff) | |
download | dtv-scan-tables-6213a2f4e91bcef2f3aac0768fffb26ac5cfa617.tar.gz |
Table /usr/share/dvb/dvb-t/cz-All outdated
reassign 720879 dtv-scan-tables
forwarded 720879 oliver@schinagl.nl
thanks
Hi Pavel,
On 25/08/13 22:32, Pavel Mendl wrote:
> Package: dvb-apps
> Version: 1.1.1+rev1483-1
>
> When I did run scan command using /usr/share/dvb/dvb-t/cz-All table, some
> channels that my "ordinary" TV did tune did not tune (even attempt to tune) on
> the PC TV adapter. I traced issue to
> the aforementioned table, which is (by commented header inside the table)
> taken from public sources not directly under the CZ TV regulator's control. I
> found the official broadcast spectrum
> regulation (as of August 2012 - currently valid) here
> http://www.ctu.cz/cs/download/plan-vyuziti-radioveho-spektra/rok_2012/pv-
> p_10-08_2012-11.pdf
>
> It states on pages 9, 15-16 that all the channels 21-60 are allocated for
> various DVB-T networks in the country. The aforementioned table cz-All did
> include just some of them, what lead to
> "missing" of some newly installed channels from the scanning. (Understandable,
> DVB-T is still in the development phase in Czech republic and many spectrum
> allocations are still designated as
> testing or not-definitive.)
>
> Attached is the new table I created, ensuring scan of all the channels
> theoretically allocatable in Czech republic. Tested on my own comp it really
> found channels consistent with the TV box scan,
> with no bugging.
>
> The only part I am not sure about is the guard-interval where 1/4 and 1/8
> values were irregularly mixed in the original table and no regulatory
> guidelines are released. Based on the theoretical
> assumption, that 1/8 should tune (i.e. not exclude) more channels than 1/4, I
> entered 1/8 for all the channels. Should you have better experience or
> regulatory resources on the topic, please,
> correct these values as appropriate.
>
> I suggest to replace the cz-All table with my updated one in the next release.
Thanks for your mail. The scan files have been split out into a
separate package called dtv-scan-tables. Therefore I am reassigning it
to d-s-t. Oliver Schinagl (CC'd) is the upstream dtv-scan-tables
maintainer. I have reattached your cz-All-actual-2013 for his consideration.
Thanks,
Jon
Signed-off-by: Oliver Schinagl <oliver@schinagl.nl>
Diffstat (limited to '')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions